US Airborne additions
- Alanmccoubrey
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:35 am
- Location: Westbury, Wilts
Re: US Airborne additions
According to Forty the US Airborne Division had a Recce Platoon of 64 all ranks which had two Recce Sections in Jeeps carrying .50cal HMG(sorry I don't have the numbers), a Mortar Squad (no details known) and a Pionier & Demolition Squad with a total of 17 Jeeps. These were Glider troops rather than Paras so might have been in Glider uniforms.
Alan
Re: US Airborne additions
I'm assuming it was the Recce units from which the Armoured Jeeps particularly associated with the 82nd Airborne came?
Edit:
Wait, caption mixup, that one might be from 82nd Armoured Recce (e.g 2nd AD's recce unit...)
If I keep chucking images, one of them might be from an airborne unit! That's what you get when you use google for sources, because you don't have any books on airborne, and it's harder to get the pictures onto the internet from there!
Re: US Airborne additions
Thank fellas,
The armoured types are from when the Paras are being used as ground troops Im really only looking at drop capable stuff at the mo.
Reckon the glider riders jeeps would have had glider uniforms, the Paras did have 'scout' sections but not heard of them having jeeps though the possibility of them hijacking Glider troops transport shouldnt be discounted lol.
But from what I can see they didnt have a specific recce jeep like the Brits which is fine by me because it means I dont have to make one/fit figures into a specific jeep model. Will probably use the Itaeri and S-Model one as the intended fit. Prefer the Airfix one but its a little more complicated and expensive and so probably less popular?
All thoughts at the moment, giving 20mm a bit of rest for a while.
L
The armoured types are from when the Paras are being used as ground troops Im really only looking at drop capable stuff at the mo.
Reckon the glider riders jeeps would have had glider uniforms, the Paras did have 'scout' sections but not heard of them having jeeps though the possibility of them hijacking Glider troops transport shouldnt be discounted lol.
But from what I can see they didnt have a specific recce jeep like the Brits which is fine by me because it means I dont have to make one/fit figures into a specific jeep model. Will probably use the Itaeri and S-Model one as the intended fit. Prefer the Airfix one but its a little more complicated and expensive and so probably less popular?
All thoughts at the moment, giving 20mm a bit of rest for a while.
L
Re: US Airborne additions
A conundrum.
Working on the Para HQ jeep figures at the moment ( shouldn't be but doing so while doing other stuff) and there is a technical problem.
Seated figures always have a problem with flashing between the legs, it just goes with the moulding process. Way around this is to make the figures two part ones, lower and upper body. 'Kit' figs have problems too, people dont like assembling figs much and I hate making em as well, specially these figures as they have sooooooo much kit at waist level
There might arise other reason why modular castings might be needed but so far I think they will work as a one piece casting but as I said with the strong possibility of flash between the legs, should be light and easy to remove. ( the other possiblity is to deliberatly 'fill' the gap between the legs) just throwing this out to see what your thoughts are, afterall your the poor devils that will be painting em lol.
L
Working on the Para HQ jeep figures at the moment ( shouldn't be but doing so while doing other stuff) and there is a technical problem.
Seated figures always have a problem with flashing between the legs, it just goes with the moulding process. Way around this is to make the figures two part ones, lower and upper body. 'Kit' figs have problems too, people dont like assembling figs much and I hate making em as well, specially these figures as they have sooooooo much kit at waist level
There might arise other reason why modular castings might be needed but so far I think they will work as a one piece casting but as I said with the strong possibility of flash between the legs, should be light and easy to remove. ( the other possiblity is to deliberatly 'fill' the gap between the legs) just throwing this out to see what your thoughts are, afterall your the poor devils that will be painting em lol.
L
Re: US Airborne additions
I use the Airfix Jeep,and would not use anything else as it is a class kit and the set comes with a trailer and pak '75'. For my book I converted one into the 82nd AB armoured jeep. So I would like crew to be able to fit into the Airfix jeep.
Re: US Airborne additions
I entirely agree Ray.
They should fit all the jeep models, the question is with how much work. The Airfix one is probably the least tricky as its a really good kit and pretty accurate. The Hasegewa quick build is more of a problem as its a little more 'compromised'. Just assembling the S models one so we shall see about that one.
I was looking at the Osprey Jeep book for details to make sure I modified the kits to US Airborne versions properly and you know the the book barely mentions them..........grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. To save my brain can you tell me what you fettled/good source of info please Ray? I know Ive got some references somewhere hereabouts but your brain might save me a lot of shelf/box/loft/HD searching.
Ta
L
They should fit all the jeep models, the question is with how much work. The Airfix one is probably the least tricky as its a really good kit and pretty accurate. The Hasegewa quick build is more of a problem as its a little more 'compromised'. Just assembling the S models one so we shall see about that one.
I was looking at the Osprey Jeep book for details to make sure I modified the kits to US Airborne versions properly and you know the the book barely mentions them..........grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. To save my brain can you tell me what you fettled/good source of info please Ray? I know Ive got some references somewhere hereabouts but your brain might save me a lot of shelf/box/loft/HD searching.
Ta
L
Re: US Airborne additions
Well Leon,The US AB jeep is the same as a standard Jeep. They built the Waco glider around it so the Americans unlike the British did not modify it at all. The Osprey books are very hit and miss
Re: US Airborne additions
Ah Ray,
Thats why I find details about Brit conversions and not US ones. Makes sense now though a line or two telling a fella that in the Osprey would have been a bit useful
Ta very much Ray you have saved me hours of more
As for Osprey you are very right from the sublime to the almost usless very occasionally.
L
Thats why I find details about Brit conversions and not US ones. Makes sense now though a line or two telling a fella that in the Osprey would have been a bit useful
Ta very much Ray you have saved me hours of more
As for Osprey you are very right from the sublime to the almost usless very occasionally.
L
Re: US Airborne additions
I for one do expect metal figures to be entirely flash free. Great when it happens but provided that there is is easily removed I'll not complain.
I think the issue with 'kit' figures is whilst some both fit together and look like the parts belong together others simply don't. FWIW I'd prefer a one piece casting and remove flash if necessary.
All in all very much looking forward to these figures.
The only mod I've come across for US AB Jeeps is a modified front fender for Jeeps operating in tandem as artillery tows for the M3 105mm pack how. Can I find a photo now....
I think the issue with 'kit' figures is whilst some both fit together and look like the parts belong together others simply don't. FWIW I'd prefer a one piece casting and remove flash if necessary.
All in all very much looking forward to these figures.
The only mod I've come across for US AB Jeeps is a modified front fender for Jeeps operating in tandem as artillery tows for the M3 105mm pack how. Can I find a photo now....
Re: US Airborne additions
I imagine for most figures, especially within the confines of a Jeep, there's precious little space for legs to make it worth trying to sculpt a definable gap between them, tricky flash or no?
- Alanmccoubrey
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:35 am
- Location: Westbury, Wilts
Re: US Airborne additions
While watching a truly terrible documentary on the Bulge this evening it was brightened by this.
What appears to me to be a Yank AB Arty Jeep as described by Dave C. It is the best I can do with juyst a photograph of the tv screen.
What appears to me to be a Yank AB Arty Jeep as described by Dave C. It is the best I can do with juyst a photograph of the tv screen.
Alan
Re: US Airborne additions
Alan
Yep that's what I was getting at
Thanks
Yep that's what I was getting at
Thanks
Re: US Airborne additions
The Guild made me do it!
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:16 am
Re: US Airborne additions
I think I have a book with that picture Alan, I will look it up tonight.While watching a truly terrible documentary on the Bulge this evening it was brightened by this.
What appears to me to be a Yank AB Arty Jeep as described by Dave C. It is the best I can do with juyst a photograph of the tv screen.
- Alanmccoubrey
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 11:35 am
- Location: Westbury, Wilts
Re: US Airborne additions
Poor Dave must be feeling offended, none of you found anything when he asked
Alan
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:16 am
Re: US Airborne additions
Got it! The still is also on dispay in the museum in la Gleize. I will check if the book offers a more detailed caption.
given the likey date of the the picture, I doubt it as used by US airborne forces before fallschirmjägers laid their hands on it.
given the likey date of the the picture, I doubt it as used by US airborne forces before fallschirmjägers laid their hands on it.
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:16 am
Re: US Airborne additions
I looked it up. The picutre is a still from film footage made on the morning of 19 December 1944 in Stoumont. The Fallschrimjäger are from III/FR-9
Re: US Airborne additions
Not at all offended, There's at least a couple of shots here way better than I'd found. The key point is that it is a pretty easy conversion compared to taking a standard production line Jeep to UK a/b configuration for example
-
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2018 11:13 am
Re: US Airborne additions
Received these today, cracking figures, well done young Leon